<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technochubby.com/2008/12/30/the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technochubby.com/2008/12/30/the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button/</link>
	<description>All things tech that give us wood!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kumeelyun</title>
		<link>http://technochubby.com/2008/12/30/the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Kumeelyun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technochubby.com/?p=75#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[th2]

Well told story, excellent visuals

We&#039;ve all wished we could go back to some point in our lives or get younger. This film does a great job of using that common thought to explore how we make our choices and live our lives.

I was warned by AngelGirl and TheJoe about the length and pace of this film, so I prepared to be comfortable sitting in the theater for three hours, at the very least. I actually found it to be very entertaining throughout. Usually a film on such a grand scale and length has me finding certain areas that could have been cut. I didn&#039;t find any wasted time. Three hours was what was needed to tell the story. The pace was what was needed to tell the story right.

I found myself making comparisons to Forrest Gump, seeing a man&#039;s personal life weaving in and out of historical events, although &#039;Benjiman&#039; doesn&#039;t do this nearly as much as &#039;Gump&#039;. It&#039;s really only one layer of this movie.

I actually ran across someone a few months ago who worked for the director and saw an advanced screening of &#039;Button&#039;. His take was that Fincher had made a film that was very un-Fincher and more like Stanley Kubrick. Personally I could see the Kubrick influence, but there were also parts of the movie that were still very Fincher-like, including a very funny running gag that I&#039;d spoil if I go into any detail.

Brad Pitt&#039;s transformation through the film is very interesting from an acting as well as a technical view. They did a very good job making him look old, but I was more taken aback with how he was made to look younger in the later half of the movie. Whether it was makeup or some form of CG, it&#039;s a very stunning effect. Acting-wise, how do you protray someone who gains with wisdom of living life while physically getting younger? Pitt does a great job with a challenging role.

I would say it&#039;s worth paying full price to see in the theater once (a recommendation I don&#039;t often make with movies of this type.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[th2]</p>
<p>Well told story, excellent visuals</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all wished we could go back to some point in our lives or get younger. This film does a great job of using that common thought to explore how we make our choices and live our lives.</p>
<p>I was warned by AngelGirl and TheJoe about the length and pace of this film, so I prepared to be comfortable sitting in the theater for three hours, at the very least. I actually found it to be very entertaining throughout. Usually a film on such a grand scale and length has me finding certain areas that could have been cut. I didn&#8217;t find any wasted time. Three hours was what was needed to tell the story. The pace was what was needed to tell the story right.</p>
<p>I found myself making comparisons to Forrest Gump, seeing a man&#8217;s personal life weaving in and out of historical events, although &#8216;Benjiman&#8217; doesn&#8217;t do this nearly as much as &#8216;Gump&#8217;. It&#8217;s really only one layer of this movie.</p>
<p>I actually ran across someone a few months ago who worked for the director and saw an advanced screening of &#8216;Button&#8217;. His take was that Fincher had made a film that was very un-Fincher and more like Stanley Kubrick. Personally I could see the Kubrick influence, but there were also parts of the movie that were still very Fincher-like, including a very funny running gag that I&#8217;d spoil if I go into any detail.</p>
<p>Brad Pitt&#8217;s transformation through the film is very interesting from an acting as well as a technical view. They did a very good job making him look old, but I was more taken aback with how he was made to look younger in the later half of the movie. Whether it was makeup or some form of CG, it&#8217;s a very stunning effect. Acting-wise, how do you protray someone who gains with wisdom of living life while physically getting younger? Pitt does a great job with a challenging role.</p>
<p>I would say it&#8217;s worth paying full price to see in the theater once (a recommendation I don&#8217;t often make with movies of this type.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

